Insurer Prevails in Fraudulent Rental Claim Dispute

2

The claimant asserted the lot was leased to a company as a conference facility, incurring a monthly rent of $3300, but became uninhabitable due to water damage. While QBE compensated the water damage, initially declining the rental loss claim, they later approved it after a review, disbursing $31,818 from January to October 2022.

However, concerns about the rental claim's legitimacy were raised by the owners' corporation, prompting further investigation. The claimant had provided a formal lease agreement purportedly made on October 1, 2021, but the incorporation of the tenant company occurred almost six months later. The claimant's director admitted the written lease was backdated in tandem with the claim submission, originally having only a verbal agreement, believing the document was necessary for the claim's success.

Furthermore, a rental ledger indicated payments for October through December 2021, which the director later conceded were never made, fabricated to bolster claim acceptance. QBE branded these actions as attempts to unjustly secure entitlements, enabling them to retrieve $46,830 in payments and costs.

Despite opposing the fraud accusation, stating the ledger mistake was not intended to mislead, AFCA concluded the claim was deceptive. They highlighted misrepresentations regarding the timeline of the lease agreement and rent payments as intentional efforts to deceive the insurer. Given the rent claim constituted a major part of the payout, AFCA deemed it justifiable for QBE to reclaim funds.

This resolution underscores the stringent expectations on claim accuracy and integrity, flagging potential repercussions for misleading insurance practices.

Published:Monday, 17th Mar 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Potential AI Errors: A Looming Challenge for Insurers 24 Apr 2025: Paige Estritori Industry experts are signaling a potential risk for underwriters due to claims arising from inaccuracies produced by artificial intelligence (AI), likening it to the 'silent cyber' phenomenon of the past. Clyde & Co partner, Darryl Smith, highlights the issue, emphasizing how AI inaccuracies could impact various insurance policies, sometimes without immediate detection. - read more

AFCA Supports RAA Insurance in Vehicle Location Dispute 24 Apr 2025: Paige Estritori An insurance dispute over the location of a vehicle culminated in the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) backing RAA Insurance in their decision to deny a claim. The issue surrounded the policyholder's claim that her son’s car was stored in South Australia, while the vehicle was allegedly used and registered in Victoria. - read more

AFCA Sides with Homeowners in Landmark Insurance Dispute Over Property Cracks 22 Apr 2025: Paige Estritori Homeowners recently secured a favourable ruling against their insurer after a water leak led to significant structural damage. After large cracks emerged on their property, Youi initially denied the insurance claim, attributing the damage to pre-existing issues like earth movement and tree root intrusion, both of which are exclusions in their policy. - read more

Climate Change Threatens Australian Suburbs with Unaffordable Insurance 17 Apr 2025: Paige Estritori More than 4% of Australian properties are currently facing heightened risks from natural hazards exacerbated by climate change, rendering insurance coverage often unaffordable or unavailable, according to recent findings by Climate Valuation. An analysis of over 15 million properties across 15,000 suburbs also highlights that an additional 10% are at moderate risk from disasters such as floods, bushfires, tropical cyclones, coastal inundation, and extreme winds. - read more

Insurer Rejects Claim Over Diesel Fluid Mix-Up 16 Apr 2025: Paige Estritori A contentious insurance claim has ended unfavourably for a motor policyholder after her husband mistakenly poured diesel exhaust fluid into her car's fuel tank. Although the policyholder initially received assurances from a Suncorp representative that the use of AdBlue fluid wouldn't be considered improper fuelling – supposedly an excluded scenario under her policy – the claim was later denied. This decision has sparked debate around policy definitions and customer service communication. - read more