The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
In a significant development, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has initiated legal proceedings in the Federal Court against QBE Insurance Group.
The move comes over what ASIC describes as serious issues with pricing discounts offered by the insurer that may have impacted over half a million policyholders.
According to ASIC, certain pricing mechanisms implemented by QBE inadvertently nullified the promised discounts under specific conditions, potentially reducing them to non-existence.
As ASIC deputy chair Sarah Court emphatically stated that the failure by insurers to deliver on pricing promises is a key priority for ASIC and that they will continue to take action to hold insurers to account. She further emphasized the need for robust systems and controls to ensure customers receive their entitled discounts.
The contentious discounts were marketed primarily through renewal communications to various customer segments, including retirees, loyal clients, shareholders, policyholders with multiple QBE products, and those without claims. Furthermore, these discount offers were featured in QBE's product disclosure statements available online.
ASIC elaborates that the post-discount pricing system at QBE allowed mechanisms like a minimum premium system, alongside cupping and capping procedures, which could significantly alter the actual discount value available to customers.
In response, QBE acknowledged the legal process concerns its delivery of pricing promises on policies such as caravan, household, marine, and motor insurance. These issues, QBE points out, stem from practices between July 2017 and September 2022.
QBE has since undertaken measures to rectify past inconsistencies, submitting a report to ASIC and emphasizing its continued cooperation. They stated in a release, “QBE apologises for the inconsistencies. QBE understands the importance of meeting its promises to its customers. QBE will review the pleadings and continue to work with ASIC on these matters.â€
For severity, QBE had reserved $US75 million ($112 million) in July 2022 as part of a remediation initiative aimed at addressing these issues.
The ongoing focus of ASIC on pricing discounts dates back to October 2021, when it instructed several insurers to scrutinize and rectify their discount practices. ASIC further requested 11 companies to “fix, repay and report†any issues associated with such discounts.
According to a regulator report released in June of the previous year, significant corrective measures had led general insurers to repay a cumulative $815 million to in excess of 5.6 million customers due to discrepancies in pricing observed since January 2018.
Such legal entanglements aren’t new for the industry. In recent history, IAG faced action resulting in a $40 million penalty for loyalty discounts related to home insurance under the NRMA brand.
The insurance news source Insurance News Magazine has covered similar outcomes, highlighting challenges faced by major insurers such as RACQ, which incurred a $10 million fine for similar allegations.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
A new Life Code Compliance Committee inquiry has put fresh attention on the way life insurers manage longer-running income protection insurance and total and permanent disability claims, finding that clearer communication and earlier information requests could reduce avoidable stress for people waiting on claim decisions. - read more
Australia’s life insurance industry has moved mental health cover back to the centre of the affordability debate, after the Council of Australian Life Insurers released its response on 30 September 2026 to the independent review of the Life Insurance Code of Practice. For workers who rely on income protection insurance, the issue is practical: mental health conditions can affect earning capacity just as seriously as physical illness, but changes designed to keep premiums manageable may also alter what is covered. - read more
ASIC’s continuing focus on superannuation member services has put another practical issue in front of Australian workers: insurance inside super is not just about whether cover exists, but whether members can understand and use it when they need help. Recent regulatory attention on trustee administration, communication and claims support is a timely reminder for anyone relying on salary continuance or income protection benefits through their fund. - read more
Australia’s financial advice reform agenda has taken another important step, with industry attention turning to how simpler, more accessible guidance could help consumers make better decisions about insurance. For workers who rely on income insurance or salary continuance cover, the issue is more practical than political: many people hold cover they do not fully understand until illness or injury forces them to test it. - read more
Australia’s financial advice reform debate has moved back into the spotlight, with life insurers and advice groups continuing to argue that many people need simpler, more affordable help to understand the insurance they already hold. For income insurance customers, the issue is practical: cover can look straightforward on a statement, but the detail often sits in definitions, waiting periods, offsets, exclusions and claim conditions. - read more
When illness strikes, the impact on your finances can be as significant as on your health. Maintaining continuous income flow during such times is crucial for financial stability. - read more
Income protection insurance applications are assessed through medical, occupational and financial underwriting. This guide explains what Australian insurers may consider, what evidence they may request and the possible outcomes before cover is offered. - read more
Income protection insurance is a type of insurance policy designed to replace a portion of your income if you are unable to work due to illness or injury. This financial safety net can help cover essential living expenses, such as mortgage repayments, utility bills, and daily costs, ensuring you maintain your standard of living during tough times. - read more
Income protection insurance and workers compensation can both provide income support after illness or injury, but they work in different ways. This guide explains the key differences for Australian employees, contractors and self-employed workers. - read more
Income protection insurance can replace part of your income if illness or injury stops you from working. Choosing the right cover means weighing your income, expenses, waiting period, benefit period, policy features and budget before you apply. - read more
Start Here !
Apply now for your free Insurance assessment and price comparisons!
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.