Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

3

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Rising Insurance Costs Amidst Climate Change: What Homeowners Need to Know

06 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

Australian homeowners are experiencing significant increases in home insurance premiums, largely due to the escalating risks associated with climate change. Recent analyses reveal a national average premium hike of 14%, translating to an additional $343 annually for policyholders. This trend underscores the growing financial burden on homeowners as extreme weather events become more frequent and severe. - read more

Competitive Market Dynamics Drive Down Construction Insurance Costs

06 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

The Australian construction insurance market has entered a notably softer phase in 2025, characterized by a significant reduction in premiums across various lines. This shift is primarily attributed to increased competition among insurers, offering clients more options and driving down costs. - read more

Why Perth Hospitality Businesses Should Reassess Their Insurance Coverage

06 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

Perth's hospitality industry is currently navigating a challenging landscape marked by escalating operational costs and evolving risks. In response, industry experts are advocating for a thorough reassessment of insurance policies to ensure businesses are adequately protected. - read more

Fine Food Australia and R&CA Announce Strategic Partnership to Strengthen Hospitality Sector

06 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

In a significant move to support Australia's hospitality industry, Fine Food Australia has announced a partnership with the Restaurant & Catering Industry Association of Australia (R&CA). This collaboration aims to provide a unified platform for industry professionals to network, share insights, and advocate for the sector's interests. - read more

Rising Risks Lead to Soaring Insurance Premiums for Hospitality Venues

06 Dec 2025: Paige Estritori

Australian hospitality venues, particularly those offering live entertainment and serving alcohol, are experiencing a significant surge in insurance premiums. This trend is attributed to the heightened risks associated with alcohol consumption and entertainment activities, leading to increased incidents and claims. - read more

Click for more Insurance News