Insurance Claim Rejected After Flight Crew Timing Violation

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The frustrated passenger incurred additional costs when his flight from Palermo to London was unexpectedly stopped because the crew had worked the maximum hours allowed by law. He expected full coverage for these expenses under his travel insurance policy.

However, Lloyd’s Australia, the insurer, denied the claim, stating that the travel policy’s clause on additional expenses and disruption coverage only applies to events such as strikes, riots, hijacks, civil unrest, adverse weather conditions, or accidents involving the mode of transport.

The claimant argued otherwise, insisting that the crew reaching its working hours limit was akin to industrial action such as strikes, implying that the insurer had a too narrow interpretation of the policy's disruption cover. He stated that the restriction on working hours is a precaution to prevent accidents, which aligns with the "spirit of the policy".

Yet, The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) did not accept this reasoning.

AFCA pointed out the scant information provided by the claimant which linked the flight cancellation directly to crew working hours being exceeded. They reinforced that this situation is distinct from a strike.

“A strike constitutes a deliberate refusal to work, whereas regulatory limits on work hours are a constraint and not a chosen action,” noted the AFCA's ombudsman. “Additionally, equating flight crew timing regulations with an accident scenario is not fitting, since the clause in question applies to actual incidents happening, not cancellations meant to forestall potential accidents.”

However, AFCA acknowledged a part of the travel policy which offers coverage for scenarios where a flight is delayed over six hours due to uncontrollable circumstances.

Under this provision, the insurer is required to compensate the complainant with the policy’s cap of $2000.

“Although the insurer claims that these circumstances are specifically excluded by the policy, they failed to indicate which exclusion they are relying on and provide justification for triggering it. Therefore, it is unconvincing that the insurer has adequately clarified its entitlement to decline or reduce the claim under this section,” AFCA concluded.

This case was originally reported by Insurance News Australia.

Published:Monday, 9th Sep 2024
Source: Paige Estritori

Please Note: If this information affects you, seek advice from a licensed professional.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Australian Insurers Adapt Investment Strategies in Response to Geopolitical Shifts

07 Mar 2026: Paige Estritori

Australian insurers are actively revising their investment portfolios in response to evolving geopolitical events and economic conditions. According to the 2025 Australian Insurance Report by Janus Henderson Investors, 47% of insurers plan to increase their investment portfolio risk over the next 12 months, with a significant focus on private markets. - read more

AFCA Upholds Policyholder Rights in Income Protection Case

27 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

In June 2025, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) ruled in favour of a policyholder in a dispute over the duration of income protection payments. The case involved Resolution Life Australasia and centred on the insurer's decision to cease payments earlier than the policyholder expected. - read more

Swiss Re Advocates for Sustainable TPD Insurance Amid Rising Claims

27 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

In October 2025, Swiss Re, a leading global reinsurer, announced a temporary halt on accepting new life insurance business in Australia. This decision aims to address concerns over the sustainability of Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) products in the market. - read more

Rising Mental Health Claims Impact Australia's Income Protection Insurance

19 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

Recent data from the Council of Australian Life Insurers (CALI) reveals a significant increase in mental health-related claims within Australia's income protection insurance sector. In 2024, mental health conditions accounted for 20% of income protection claims, resulting in payouts totaling $887 million. This marks a substantial rise compared to previous years, indicating a growing trend that insurers and policyholders must address. - read more

Australian Super Under Fire for Prolonged Insurance Claim Delays

19 Feb 2026: Paige Estritori

Australian Super, the nation's largest superannuation fund, is facing criticism over significant delays in processing insurance claims. Reports indicate that some members have experienced prolonged waiting periods, with delays extending up to four years in certain cases. These delays have raised concerns about the efficiency and fairness of the fund's claims handling processes. - read more

Click for more Insurance News